Skip to main content
ToolsHub

Color Blindness Simulator

See your images through the eyes of people with color blindness. Test 8 vision types with canvas pixel transforms. Free accessibility checker.

Updated

Files never leave your browser

Click or drag an image here

JPG, PNG, WebP — processed client-side

How to use Color Blindness Simulator

Simulate how your design or image looks to users with different types of color vision deficiency — deuteranopia, protanopia, tritanopia, and monochromacy. Upload an image or enter a URL to preview it through each simulation filter. Helps identify color combinations that are indistinguishable to color-blind users before they reach production.

  1. Upload an image (PNG, JPG, or WebP) or take a screenshot of your design.
  2. Select a color vision deficiency type to simulate.
  3. Compare the original and simulated views side by side.
  4. Identify any UI elements (charts, status indicators, buttons) that rely solely on color.
  5. Add text labels, patterns, or icons to supplement color-only distinctions.

Your data never leaves your device — 100% private processing.

Types of color vision deficiency

Deuteranopia (green-blind) and protanopia (red-blind) together affect approximately 8% of males and 0.5% of females of Northern European ancestry — these are the most important to design for. Both cause red and green to appear very similar (olive/brown tones). Tritanopia (blue-blind) is much rarer, affecting fewer than 1 in 10,000 people, and causes confusion between blue and yellow. Achromatopsia (total color blindness / monochromacy) is extremely rare — less than 1 in 33,000 — but designing for it produces highly accessible monochrome-friendly interfaces.

TypeMissing coneAffected populationColors confused
ProtanopiaRed (L)~1% malesRed and green
DeuteranopiaGreen (M)~6% malesRed and green
TritanopiaBlue (S)<0.01%Blue and yellow
AchromatopsiaAll cones<0.003%All colors

Designing for color accessibility

Never use color as the sole means of conveying information — always supplement with text labels, icons, patterns, or shape differences. Common failures: red/green traffic-light status indicators, pie/bar charts differentiated only by color, form validation that turns only the border red. Solutions: add a text label ("Error", "Success"), use distinct icons (✓ ✗), increase the lightness contrast between the colors (not just hue), and add a pattern or texture fill to chart segments. Test with the deuteranopia simulation first — it's the most prevalent and the most challenging.

Worked examples

Red/green status badges

Inputs: green "OK" + red "Error" badges

Result: deuteranopia: both shift toward similar olive/brown

Traffic-light chart

Inputs: red, amber, green segments

Result: protanopia: red and green become hard to tell apart

Glossary

Deuteranopia
A color vision deficiency caused by absent or non-functional green-sensitive (M) cone cells — most common type.
Protanopia
Absence of red-sensitive (L) cones, causing red and green to appear similar.
Tritanopia
Absence of blue-sensitive (S) cones, affecting blue-yellow discrimination — very rare.
Color-blind safe palette
A set of colors chosen to remain distinguishable under the most common forms of color vision deficiency.

Related reading

Free · No spam

Get weekly tool tips & updates

New tools, power-user tips, and productivity hacks — delivered free every Friday.

No spam, ever. Unsubscribe with one click.

Related Color & Design

Explore all Color & Design.